AdverseTrend and Data Management
AdverseTrend and Data Management
Adversetrends are events that relay a sense of harmfulness or hostility topeople. On the other hand, data management involves the procedurethat controls collection, storing, retrieval of data to be utilizedwith optimal precision and efficacy while maintaining integrity.Adverse trends in the healthcare system entail mismanagement ofrecords or wrongful administration of medicine. The incidents posegreat threats to the organization.
Medicalerrors have risen considerably. They cause detrimental impacts to thequality of the health facilities since most of them harm patients. Asa matter of fact, research has shown that errors in the health caresystem are leading in causing mortality and morbidity issues withinthe United States. Several states have reported cases of adverseactivities that affect patients. The incidents are many even thoughthe reported cases are few. Some organizations or patients do notreport such cases. The errors are harmful to the patient’s health.
Forinstance, accidental switching of patients’ results can lead towrong medication. If the health care provider offered medicationaccording to the lab results without confirming the same, then itwould have been a different case. Probably, the patient could havebeen given wrong treatment impacting negatively on her. The patientis also affected psychologically. It could make him/her doubt theability of the facility to offer adequate care. The organization’sname can be tarnished with such reports. In other words, if the restof the population gets the information, they would probably ignorethe facility to look for a better one (Kenneth, 2010).
Whenevera mistake occurs, the entire facility is held accountable. Errors inthe system can stimulate court cases where the patient takes legalaction against the facility for negligence. In fact, providing wrongresults is medical malpractice. In that regard, information from allthe involved personnel is necessary to ascertain the root of theissue and make appropriate decisions. The nurses who conducted thetests, emergency room personnel, unit coordinator, and the healthcare practitioner must all provide information on what transpired.The hospital management must also explain how and why the eventoccurred. For instance. They should check if their systems arefaulty, or whether the workers are competent. It is, therefore, themanager’s responsibility to offer explanations regarding thequality of staff as well as equipment. The patient’s assertions arealso important (Kenneth, 2010).
Theinformation would be gathered through several patient questionnairesrecording the various ailments, medical care provided, and medicalpractitioner’s competency. The patient information would bedetailed from the time she entered the facility. Different patientswill be provided with the questionnaires to get a broad knowledge ofthe cases. An audit team must also examine the equipment as well asthe data system.
Sincethe event has happened three times in a single month, it is essentialto consider the other cases as well. A repeated error must havesomething in common. In that regard, the decision-making process hasto be guided by the findings provided by the patients, nurses, healthcare practitioner, and the management. Apart from that, the systemadministrator must provide information about the facility’sstructure. The data system methods will entail questionnaires,observations, interviews, and surveys. Observation can be done in afull week and must be conducted by an independent person or body.
Forthe decision-making process to be transparent, consistent, andsystemic, all disciplines within the organization must be involved.Usually the best way of conducting and making logical decisionsinvolve identifying the decision to be made, gathering adequateinformation, ascertaining alternatives, weighing the evidence,selecting the best option, take action, and then review the decisionsand consequences. The whole procedure is systematic. In relation tothis case, each of the above decision-making steps needs consistency.For instance, if the blame is directed towards management, thenaction should be done with relevance to the team. The electronicmedical record is a suitable tool used to analyze patients’information and offer them quality care. The tool provides all thedata required for a patient within the facility. Surveillance andCCTV cameras are also relevant technologies (Kenneth, 2010). Whileconducting interviews, the technologies would encourageopen-mindedness to gather sufficient data.
Whenit comes to offering health care, patients are well protected withinthe system. This research will use computer and EHR systems to coverall the aspects involved. The technologies would relay patientcomplaints as well as compliments, assess patient’s healthprogress, and evaluate the records. The techniques would improve thequality of care, better coordination of patients, and reduced errors.Privacy and confidentiality are key ethical considerations. Use ofEHR brings about legal problems in the health care system.
Healthcare practitioners are usually encouraged to keep patient informationprivate. Sharing patient information is unethical. Use ofsurveillance cameras and CCTV might also cause privacy issues. Thepatient’s privacy during reception of care must be adhered to. Suchsituations put medical practitioners in a dilemma. However, the vitalthing is to use the technologies properly to monitor happeningswithin the facility. It would boost accountability, therebyheightening the quality of care (Paule Poulin, 2013).
Strategiesused to advocate for social justice within the health care design,and delivery can be viewed from several angles. However, the mostcommonly used techniques include policy monitoring and communalaccountability and conducting campaigns for policy change. In thefirst strategy, it is evident that policy-related advocacy startswith careful observation to monitor the existing system. In thiscase, all the usual undertakings within the healthcare facilityshould be checked to establish the loopholes. Accountability andmonitoring by the public would be simplified through the governmentand other state institutions. Advocacy is also easier when the designand delivery of social justice are communal. In other words, thecommunity is deeply involved in structuring the care procedures. Theorganization’s staff will also play a significant role. The otherstrategy entails policy change campaigns.
Thegeneral public must benotifiedof the policy changes. Though the system may incorporate their views,some people have a propensity of ignoring such events. However,campaigns can be used to educate them on the importance of alteringthe policy. Policy changes will affect the healthcare staff. In thatregard, they must be educated on the necessity to change. Thecampaigns are also meant to achieve consensus among all thestakeholders involved. In general, the healthcare system wouldbenefit from the inception of freshtechnologies and policies to boost patient care. Hence, socialinjustices within the facilities will diminish [ CITATION Ear08 l 1033 ].
Earp, A. E. (2008). Strategies for Achieving Patient-Centered Care. Canada: Jones and Bartlett Publisher.
Kenneth W. Kizer, M. B. (2010). Serious Reportable Adverse Events in Health Care. Advances in Patient Safety: Vol.4, 339-352.
Paule Poulin, L. A. (2013). Introduction of new technologies and decision making processes: a framework to adapt a Local Health Technology Decision Support Program for other local settings. 185-193.